D. Medvedev
To Win
L. Djere
To Win
Daniil Medvedev vs Flavio Cobolli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L L W W L
Form
W L L W W W W W L LH2H: Medvedev 2 - 0 Cobolli
They have played 5 sets in total, with Medvedev winning 5 and Cobolli winning 0. The last match between Medvedev and Cobolli was at the China Open - Beijing, 30-09-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Daniil Medvedev getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | 2 |
| Flavio Cobolli | 0 |
China Open - Beijing(30-09-2024)
6
2
6
4
| Medvedev | Stats | Cobolli |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (14-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 42% (8-11) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 10 | Ranking | 36 |
| 1 | Highest Rank | 30 |
| 29 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 25 | Titles | 4 |
| 71% (551-228) | Career Total W/L | 56% (200-155) |
| $31,831,320 | Career Prize Money | $1,643,300 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Goffin VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Arnaldi VS Coric PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Flavio Cobolli
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Flavio Cobolli
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
39%
(
37 of
96)
9
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 30 | Games Won | 16 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:53:14 | Average Match Time | 1:53:14 |
| 54% (84/156) | 1st Serve % | 43% (65/150) |
| 80% (67/84) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (38/65) |
| 46% (33/72) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (35/85) |
| 39% (11/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (4/20) |
| 51% (77/150) | Return Points Win % | 36% (56/156) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniil Medvedev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Daniil Medvedev
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Alexandre Muller
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
69 of
122)
7
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
122)
115
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Karen Khachanov
50%
(
48 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
85 of
119)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
33%
(
16 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
47%
(
45 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
62 of
119)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Daniil Medvedev
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Daniil Medvedev
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Arthur Fils
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
74%
(
25 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Tommy Paul
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
8
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Alex Michelsen
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
9
Total Points Won
3
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
40%
(
21 of
52)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Daniil Medvedev
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
109)
5
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
115
|
2-6 7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Flavio Cobolli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Flavio Cobolli
64%
(
89 of
138)
1st Serve %
45%
(
48 of
106)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
46%
(
63 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
123
Total Points Won
121
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Flavio Cobolli
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Dusan Lajovic
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Sebastian Baez
45%
(
31 of
69)
1st Serve %
84%
(
62 of
74)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Damir Dzumhur
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Filip Misolic
49%
(
37 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Richard Gasquet
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Flavio Cobolli
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kei Nishikori
Player
Flavio Cobolli
63%
(
65 of
103)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
97)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Eliot Spizzirri
59%
(
66 of
111)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71% (551/228) | Win/Loss | 56% (200/155) |
| 66% (1290/659) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (458/401) |
| 56% (10357/8252) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (4138/4025) |
| 75% (256/84) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (54/37) |
| 65% (90/49) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (129/86) |
| 68% (149/71) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35% (14/26) |
| 70% (56/24) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) |
| 0.57 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 5166 | Aces Total | 1323 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 2461 | Total Double Faults | 1062 |
| 1:33:26 | Average Match Time | 1:44:5 |
| 323.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 301.43 |
| 61% (31609/51932) | 1st Serve % | 54% (13988/25669) |
| 75% (23654/31609) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (9600/13988) |
| 51% (10361/20316) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5834/11681) |
| 43% (2322/5367) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1118/2732) |
| 40% (21457/53665) | Return Points Win % | 40% (10387/25800) |
| 74% (91/32) | Slam W/L | 57% (17/13) |
| 68% (114/54) | Masters W/L | 43% (12/16) |
| 77% (20/6) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 72% (180/70) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (46/36) |
| 52% (12/11) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 69% (55/25) | Challenger W/L | 57% (102/76) |
| 73% (74/28) | Futures W/L | 63% (22/13) |
| 71% (458/647) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (188/334) |
| 72% (88/123) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 57% (159/278) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (59/117) |
| 63% (137/219) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (77/129) |
| 91% (503/458) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (179/159) |
| 9% (503/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (179/20) |
| 33% (275/92) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (176/41) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
